BREAKING: Strange UN Planes Landing At US Air Force Bases

BZ EN VOL UN

There have been multiple civilian sightings of strange planes landing at American Air Force bases, all carrying UN troops and/or having UN markings (or none). My husband, a Vietnam vet, has been back and forth to Overton-Brooks VA Medical Hospital three times a week this month. Barksdale Air Force Base, one of the most secure Strategic Air Command (SAC) bases in the nation, has had unusual C-130s or C-136s fly into Barksdale AFB and land at all hours. The interstate runs in front of the side and front of the base and is clearly visible with no restraints. (Barksdale is where President George W. Bush landed on 9/11, it is such a safe, secure, and well-guarded installation.) These flights have been reported by other citizens and several of the military men who work inside the base have reported that the UN troops are given US military clothing and name tags. When our servicemen question this, the soldiers are told they did NOT see what they just saw. Base operations refused to confirm or deny or discuss these sightings.

Lately, rumors and reports regarding the presence of foreign troops in the US working with our armed forces have been hitting public awareness. Originally government sources denied these reports, but now official reports are confirming what eye witnesses had been reporting. (www.SaveAmericaFoundation.com) Russia herself confirms that the Obama administration has requested 15,000 Russian troops to train with FEMA in the event of a SHTF scenario, particularly in the Washington D.C., Maryland, and Virginia area.

The question is why? It appears that foreign troops are working with US troops, practicing on urban warfare, civil unrest, and civil disturbance scenarios. In Colorado, rumors of Russian troops practicing to deal with terrorist raids and martial law scenarios have been proven correct by our own US armed forces. Peterson AFB in Colorado is another base being used.

Bombshell New Book Reveals… How To Survive The Coming Martial Law In America

Located in Germany is the Marshall Center, named after General George C. Marshall, who was quite the UN/NWO devotee. At this present time, the Department of Defense is conducting classes in counterterrorism. Of course, the definition of “terrorism” belongs to new world order advocates. According to the definition used by the NWO, a terrorist is anyone who opposes a takeover of their nation. That would make all NWO resistors and/or anyone who disagrees with the new world order plans potential terrorists.

Are You A Terrorist By Their Definition?

Do you believe in our national sovereignty and national Constitution? Do you believe in religious liberty and freedom of speech? Do you believe in the right to own guns and bear arms? Are you prepared to stand up and fight for your freedom if an order of martial law is imposed?

Then by UN/NWO definition, you are a terrorist!

The problem with these foreign troops being trained to intervene on American soil in SHTF scenarios which might occur here is that they have no loyalty to our Constitution, they have no loyalty to the inherent rights that have always been ours as American citizens, and they have no basis for restraint in any action they might perceive as necessary, regardless of our laws. They have no constitutional right to interfere in the internal events of our country.

NATO and the UN have the same goal, mission, and function: to subvert the sovereignty of the United States and the rest of the world, turning us all into a fascist worldwide state. Our government officials have proven time and again here lately that they are not to be trusted. Congress is nothing more than a rubber stamp for what the administration wants, not the representative body of the citizenry as it should be.

What catastrophic event is this administration preparing to implement now in order to seize the control they so desperately want?

Source

Advertisements

U.N. Report Advocates Teaching Masturbation to 5-Year-Olds

UN flagxxxXXX11

The United Nations is recommending that children as young as five receive mandatory sexual education that would teach even pre-kindergarteners about masturbation and topics like gender violence.

The U.N.’s Economic, Social and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) released a 98-page report in June offering a universal lesson plan for kids ranging in age from 5-18, an
“informed approach to effective sex, relationships” and HIV education that they say is essential for “all young people.”

The U.N. insists the program is “age appropriate,” but critics say it’s exposing kids to sex far too early, and offers up abstract ideas — like “transphobia” — they might not even understand.

“At that age they should be learning about … the proper name of certain parts of their bodies,” said Michelle Turner, president of Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum, “certainly not about masturbation.”

Turner was disturbed by UNESCO’s plans to explain to children as young as nine about the safety of legal abortions, and to advocate and “promote the right to and access to safe abortion” for everyone over the age of 15.

“This is absurd,” she told FOXNews.com.

The UNESCO report, called “International Guidelines for Sexuality Education,” separates children into four age groups: 5-to-8-year-olds, 9-to-12-year-olds, 12-to-15-year-olds and 15-to-18-year-olds.

Under the U.N.’s voluntary sex-ed regime, kids just 5-8 years old will be told that “touching and rubbing one’s genitals is called masturbation” and that private parts “can feel pleasurable when touched by oneself.”

Click here to see the report.

By the time they’re 9 years old, they’ll learn about “positive and negative effects of ‘aphrodisiacs,” and wrestle with the ideas of “homophobia, transphobia and abuse of power.”

At 12, they’ll learn the “reasons for” abortions — but they’ll already have known about their safety for three years. When they’re 15, they’ll be exposed to direct “advocacy to promote the right to and access to safe abortion.”

Child health experts say they are wary of teaching about the sticky topic of abortion, but stress that as long as messages stay age-appropriate, educating kids at a younger age helps better steer them into adulthood.

“The adults are more leery of [early sex-ed] than the kids are,” said Dr. Jennifer Hartstein, a child psychiatrist in New York. “Our own fears sometimes prevent us from being as open and honest with our kids as possible.”

Hartstein, however, who didn’t see much harm in explaining basic concepts that kids of all ages will have questions about, was baffled by some of the ideas the U.N. hoped to introduce to kids as young as 5 years old, who will be taught about “gender roles, stereotypes and gender-based violence.”

“I want to know how you teach that to a 5-year-old,” Hartstein told FOXNews.com.

Despite those challenges, the U.N. insists that “in a world affected by HIV and AIDS … there is an imperative to give children and young people the knowledge, skills and values to understand and make informed decisions.”

UNESCO officials said the guidelines were “co-authored by two leading experts in the field of sexuality education” — Dr. Doug Kirby, an adolescent sexuality expert, and Nanette Ecker, the former director of international education and training at the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States.

Their report was based on a “rigorous review” of sex-ed literature, “drawing upon 87 studies from around the world,” said Mark Richmond, director of UNESCO’s Division for the Coordination of U.N. Priorities in Education, in an e-mailed statement.

Richmond defended teaching about masturbation as “age-appropriate” because even in early childhood, “children are known to be curious about their bodies.” Their lessons, he added, would hopefully help kids “develop a more complex understanding of sexual behaviour” as they grow into adults.

But Michelle Turner, of Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum, said that such roles should be left up to parents, and worried that children were being exposed to too much information too soon.

Source

North Korea Threatens to Reduce Parts of US to Ashes

In a blatant threat Tuesday North Korea said that it’s artillery units “are assigned to strike bases of the U.S. imperialist aggressor troops in the U.S. mainland and on Hawaii and Guam and other operational zones in the Pacific as well as all the enemy targets in South Korea and its vicinity.”

PANMUNJOM, SOUTH KOREA - FEBRUARY 27: South Korean soldiers stand guard at the border village of Panmunjom between South and North Korea at the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) on February 27, 2013 in South Korea. North Korea confirmed it had successfully carried out an underground nuclear test on February 12, as a shallow earthquake with a magnitude of 4.9 was detected by several international monitoring agencies. (Photo by Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images)

PANMUNJOM, SOUTH KOREA – South Korean soldiers stand guard at the border village of Panmunjom between South and North Korea at the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) on February 27, 2013 in South Korea. North Korea confirmed it had successfully carried out an underground nuclear test on February 12, as a shallow earthquake with a magnitude of 4.9 was detected by several international monitoring agencies. (Photo by Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images)

by Shepard Ambellas
Intellihub.com

March 27, 2013

In an attempt to rattle the sabre, North Korea’s military establishment has now made threats against the US and South Korea setting the stage for a crisis to develop.

The New York Times reports;

“They should be mindful that everything will be reduced to ashes and flames the moment the first attack is unleashed,”

the North Korean command said in a statement carried by the North’s official Korean Central News Agency.

Tensions on the Korean Peninsula have risen after North Korea’s launching of a three-stage rocket in December and its third nuclear test last month. In response, Washington and Seoul pushed for a United Nations Security Council resolution imposing more sanctions on North Korea and this month began their annual joint military drills intended to warn North Korea against attacking the South.

North Korea has since issued a torrent of threats to turn Washington and Seoul into a “sea of fire.” Its leader, Kim Jong-un, who has inherited the “military first” policy of his late father, Kim Jong-il, has made a round of visits to military units in the last week. He inspected live-fire artillery and amphibious landing exercises, ordering his soldiers to send the enemies “to the bottom of the sea as they run wild like wolves threatened with fire,” according to North Korean media.

China has commented saying that the situation is indeed “sensitive” in nature.

Aljazeera.com reports, “The communist state’s foreign ministry said it will inform the UN Security Council of the latest situation, as tensions continue to simmer on Wednesday.

“Upon authorisation of the Foreign Ministry, the DPRK openly informs the UN Security Council that the Korean Peninsula now has the conditions for a simmering nuclear war,” the statement said. “This is because of provocation moves by the US and South Korean puppets”.

A new nuclear war is now on the table.

 

Sources:

^http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2013/03/20133274430576757.html

^http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/world/asia/north-korea-calls-hawaii-and-us-mainland-targets.html

Iran builds 3,000 new advanced centrifuges to enrich uranium

 

A handout picture released by the official website of Iran's presidency office shows Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visits Natanz uranium enrichment facilities some 300 kms, south of the capital Tehran on April 8, 2008.  (AFP Photo)

A handout picture released by the official website of Iran’s presidency office shows Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visits Natanz uranium enrichment facilities some 300 kms, south of the capital Tehran on April 8, 2008. (AFP Photo)

Iran is building 3,000 advanced centrifuges for enriching uranium, announced the republic’s nuclear chief as Israel accuses Tehran of using the six-party talks to “buy time” for producing an atomic bomb.

“The final production line of [new] centrifuges has finished,” Fereydoon Abbasi, the head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization said. “The early generation of these centrifuges which have low efficiency will be put away soon,” he added, as cited by Fars News Agency.

 

In February, Tehran announced that it would install new IR-2m centrifuges – which can produce more enriched uranium in a shorter period of time – at its Natanz uranium enrichment plant. However, Sunday’s statement appeared to be the first time Iran has provided a specific figure about such machines.

 

Abbasi stressed earlier that the new generation centrifuges were developed for the enrichment of uranium below five percent and cannot be used for 20-percent enrichment.

 

Currently, the Islamic republic has around 12,000 IR-1 first-generation centrifuges at its Natanz facility. Earlier in February, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the country had begun installing advanced centrifuges at the plant. The UN nuclear watchdog said that 180 IR-2m centrifuges had been put in place at the facility but were not operational.

 

The move drew condemnation from world powers fearing Tehran is seeking weapons technology, while Iran maintains its nuclear program is purely for civilian purposes.

 

The news on 3,000 new centrifuges comes less than a week after six world powers – the US, UK, France, Germany, Russia and China – and Iran gathered in Kazakhstan for talks on the disputed nuclear program.

 

Israeli President Shimon Peres (C) meets with US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman (L) and US ambassador to Israel Daniel Shapiro, in Herzliya on February 28, 2013, following the P5+1 meeting on Iran (AFP Photo / Jack Guez)

 

International negotiators offered a limited relaxation of tight sanctions against Iran. In exchange, they want the republic to suspend its 20 percent uranium enrichment and, also, freeze its works at its Fordo underground facility.

 

Tehran said it was positive about the outcome of the two-day negotiations which ended up with an agreement on further meetings.

 

“The new proposal of the P5+1 group is closer to some of our views,” said Ali Baqeri, deputy secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council. The details of the proposal should be further discussed at the Istanbul expert-level meeting, he added, as cited by Iranian PressTV.

 

Israel – which earlier signalled the possibility of launching a pre-emptive strike against Iranian nuclear facilities if diplomacy yields no results in nuclear talks – believes the latest round of talks brought no breakthrough.

 

“My impression from these talks is that the only thing that is gained from them is a buying of time, and through this time-buying Iran intends to continue enriching nuclear material for an atomic bomb and is indeed getting closer to this goal,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated on Sunday, cites Reuters.

 

The UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, on the contrary, said earlier he was optimistic about the meeting, but added that Iran still has to win the trust of the international community.

Source

Prophecy Alert: The Peace Treaty, Planet X, and the Rapture!

SCROLL222aaxxxxxThere are stories floating around on the Internet that the Peace Treaty has been drawn up and has been distributed to various leaders for acceptance.

“we got the best agreement possible and it is a victory for us!” Here it is in short: 1. Palestinian statehood – this is already a fait accompli, clearly in the interests of both sides – the territorial expression of our national identity sealed by agreement, recognized by the international community, accepted by the United Nations and fulfilling the principle laid down in UN Resolution 181 from November 29, 1947 – the formal birth certificate of the two states – the establishment of two states – one Jewish and one Arab on the land known as Palestine/Israel.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=303971

“The formal birth certificate of the two states,” now that is an interesting statement. Here is some pertinent analysis of the story by Hebrew Nation Radio (HT Cindy)
“What does it mean? (Commentary from HN News editor) The story from the Jerusalem Post is a BOMBSHELL story.  This story, “leaks to the press” that the parameters of a Two State Solution deal ALREADY EXISTS and has been basically agreed upon by Netanyahu and Abbas. … 
How likely is it that Obama is coming to Israelto announce this “secret deal” that has already been made? 
Time will tell…but the leaking of THIS STORY to the press seems to indicate that such a “closet deal” has already been signed onto by both sides and that Obama may be coming to make this announcement with much hoopla and fanfare.”
And I am sure that you are aware what day President Obama is heading to Jerusalem—Nisan 10. Nisan 10 the day that Jesus rode into Jerusalem a donkey and presented Himself to the world as the Messiah. There are some interesting aspects to this date as told by Carlos at the Chozeh and Nabiy blog;
I would also like to add something that stands out to me about this trip from a historical perspective.  Jesus Christ the Messiah entered Jerusalem riding upon a donkey on 10 Nisan in what was the Gregorian year AD 33.  President Obama will enter Jerusalem on this very day in the Gregorian year 2013.  The difference is therefore precisely 1980 years.  Here is what the late David Flynn had to say about the number 1980 and the year 2013* (bold emphasis C.M.N.)-
“. . . Since AD 33 represented the end of Satan’s ‘full authority’ over mankind, it is reasonable that a form of this number should appear before AD 33 . . . If 6,660 years ended in AD 33, the complete cycle of a third of the precession would require an additional 1,980 years to be completed (which would equal 8,640 years) . . . In navigation, 33 degrees of the circle of the Earth has 1,980 nautical miles.  This is found by multiplying 60 minutes in an hour times 33.  One thousand nine hundred eighty years needs 6,660 years more to equal 8,640 years, and is the exact number of minutes in 33 hours, as well as nautical miles in 33 degrees of the great circle of the Earth.  The majority of Draco’s tail lies along 6,660 years of the precessional circuit.  The number 2013 is the number of minutes in 33 hours + 33 minutes and the number of nautical miles in 33.33 degrees of the great circle of the Earth.”
The term “Satan’s full authority” caught my eye, and it seems to me, then, that 2013 should feature an event in which an agent of Satan (that is to say, an antichrist figure) attempts to usurp the throne of the true Messiah.  This could be precisely what will occur next month in Jerusalem; we shall see.  Anyway, in combination with the content of the articles above this quote should represent some serious food for thought!  And as I’ve been shouting for some time now, the year 2013 has a startling prophetic signature to it.  I’ve also written extensively about 2013 here-http://nabiy4america.wordpress.com/2012/12/31/3545/

 

Will this be the day that the peace treaty is announced? I ran across an interesting video of an interview of an Iranian scientist that suggests that very thing—the peace treaty will be announced during President Obama’s visit. The peace treaty info starts at 20:20.
 

 

In his discourse, if I understood him correctly, he mentioned 3/21 as the day the peace treaty would be presented and 4/21 as the day it would be accepted. He also said that the reason for these rapid developments is because Iranhas developed new weapons and defenses based on anti gravity technologies which have changed the “game.” He claims that Iran can now defeat conventional warfare tactics rendering them useless.

Regardless of if the “new electrics” part is true or not, one thing that caught my attention in the interview was the dates; 3/21/13 and 4/21/13. In The Coming Epiphany and at The End Times Forecaster Blog I have put forth the theory that the 70th week—the last 7 years before the Second Coming of Christ—may have begun on 11/10/2009. Adding 1260 days to the start of the 70th week will bring you to the midpoint of the 70thweek.  1260 days past 11/10/2009 is 4/22/13 (+- a day for Hebrew time).

So we have information that suggests that the peace treaty is a done deal and is likely to be accepted on 4/21—within a day of the calculated date of the midpoint of the 70th week, and if you take into account Hebrew time—the exact day! I believe this is a very significant development.

But you say wait a minute, Dan 9:27 tells us that the peace treaty is supposed to occur at the beginning of the 70th week, not the middle. Oh really?

…Daniel 9:27…When you examine the Hebrew, the true meaning becomes clearly evident. Roy Reinhold, author of The Day of the Lord and an expert in Hebrew, has this to say about the verse:

The “he” is the same person throughout the verse. Higbir is a hifil 3ms perfect verb, and the Qal root verb is gavar meaning “to be strong, to conquer.” A Hifil is “causative,” and so in this case the usage is “and he caused to be made strong” a covenant for the many for one period of seven. In no way does this imply that the “he” the antichrist originates the peace treaty. What it clearly shows is that the antichrist comes along after the peace treaty is in effect and he agrees with it and enforces its provisions.

So an analysis of the Hebrew brings out the fact that, when the antichrist is revealed and comes to power in the midst of the 70th Week, the peace treaty will already be in effect and “he,” the antichrist, will merely confirm and or strengthen it… The Coming Epiphany, p. 60.

The first news articles about the peace treaty listed above suggest that the agreement was established in 1947—“the territorial expression of our national identity sealed by agreement, recognized by the international community, accepted by the United Nations and fulfilling the principle laid down in UN Resolution 181 from November 29, 1947.” If this treaty that is already in effect is agreed upon and adhered to, it would be strengthened and would fulfill the prophecy. I wonder who the “he” is?

The rumblings about the peace treaty added to the major signaling taking place regarding the birth of the antichrist, that is foretelling the destruction of the Hoover Dam (water breaking) and the eruption of the Yellowstone supervolcano (ring of fire pain) and its association with the land of Israel, I would say that it is looking as if major prophetic events are about to occur. In case you missed them here are the posts about the antichrist birthing ritual signaling—here comes destiny’s child.

Warning: The Yellowstone Supervolcano and Strike Zone 2—The Hunger Games are on!

Warning: Antichrist Birthing Rituals Imminent—The Water is about to Break

Warning #2: Antichrist Birthing Rituals Imminent–the Water is About to Break

If we are indeed approaching the midpoint of the 70thweek, then between now and then I would expect a Mid East war to break out (WWIII), the economies of the world to collapse, a pandemic, and the birthing/arising of the antichrist and its associated events, including the head wound incident and major UFO events. Some other things to look for would be great geologic events resulting in infrastructure destructions and loss of the internet, at least as we know it. And let’s not forget that if tradition holds true we may see the two witnesses come on the scene on Passover 3/26-27/2013.

Are there any other indications that we are in the 70thweek near the midpoint and the time of the arising of the antichrist? Scripture tells us that after the midpoint the antichrist takes over the world, institutes the mark, and will begin persecuting Jews and Christians, which is then followed by the rapture. Scripture also tells us that the rapture will happen after the sixth seal is opened—I present a proof of this fact in Chapter 3 of The Coming Epiphany.

In looking at the events of the sixth seal I believe that coincide with what many cultures have told us occur at a planet X or Nibiru passage. So if the antichrist is ready to arise, then the rapture/sixth seal/planet X events would not be too far away. So are there any indications that planet X is nearby? Glad you asked. Researcher Gill Broussard believes so, and puts forth the theory that the most likely time will be 2013-16.

 

Are there any other indications this may be true? James McCanney says a mini solar system is entering ours. Planet X is supposed to have other bodies traveling with it—that would be Trumpet 1: meteor shower, Trumpet 2: A huge meteor, and Trumpet 3: a comet. Those bodies and other things would constitute a “mini solar system.” And here is some more information about the timing of Planet X from a post this Fall.

Source

The illusion of control: Meteorite explosion puts space on UN agenda

The UN released proposals for a response to the threat of objects from space impacting the Earth. DW looks at the implications of last week’s meteorite explosion and what the UN could do for the space industry.

The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) released its recommendations for an international response to the threat of objects from space this week – five days after a large asteroid narrowly missed the Earth and a meteorite explosion caused significant damage in Chelyabinsk, Russia. The explosion of the 17-meter-long asteroid was 30 times more powerful than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, according to calculations by Peter Brown from Canada’s University of Western Ontario.

Apart from identifying existing gaps in the work of identifying near-Earth objects (NEOs) that may pose a threat to the planet, the UNOOSA wants to form an International Asteroid Warning Network as well as a space missions planning advisory group.

The meteorite that hit Chelyabinsk was unexpected – scientists did not have it on their radar

More UN involvement?

It is still too early to say whether the event in Chelyabinsk will increase international collaboration and lead to the formation of an organization to coordinate national space agencies. A meeting of the space agencies at Planetary Defense Conference in April will discuss the UN’s proposals and make its own recommendations, according to Nicolas Bobrinsky, head of the European Space Agency’s Space Situation Awareness (SSA) program.

“It would be extremely useful to have a forum where space agencies can meet under the forum and protection of the UN,” he told DW.

Alan Harris from the German Space Agency’s (DLR) also said the UN could help. “An international agreement, which recognizes the problem and supports the establishment of an organization […] which could coordinate government efforts is needed,” he said.

Asteroid mitigation

Both the ESA and the German Space Agency are doing extensive research on near-Earth objects, but they have different focuses. The ESA concentrates on asteroid detection and discovery, while the DLR works to find ways of deflecting asteroids that are on a collision course with Earth.

faces-of-doom-doomsday-destruction-31242505-1440-900a

An asteroid ended the dinosaur era 65 million years ago

The DLR, along with its counterparts in the United States and Russia, believes the course of an asteroid can be changed by launching a space probe with a substantial mass into the space body. The probe could alter the asteroid’s velocity and thereby change its course, Harris said.

“The only uncertainty is that degree of deflection depends on the shape of the asteroid,” he added.

Expensive undertaking

It will cost more than 100 million euros ($131 million) to pay for a spacecraft that can change the course of an asteroid. Harris, as well as other space experts, said he hopes increased awareness of the danger meteorites could pose to the Earth after last week’s explosion in Russia will improve the chances of raising the funds needed for the mission.

Should the program get off the ground, asteroids least 50 meters across will likely be deflected using a space probe. Anything smaller, like the asteroid in Chelyabinsk, will lead to evacuation of the projected point of impact. More than 1,000 people were injured when the meteorite exploded last Friday (15.02.2013).

In 1908, an asteroid in Siberia, knocked down some 80 million trees

Harris said scientists will carry out cost-benefit analyses to determine whether sending a probe makes sense. The meteorite in Chelyabinsk caused 25 million euros worth of damage, which would not have justified a mission worth more than 100 million euros, Harris said.

Many unanswered questions

There’s a good chance programs to detect and deal with asteroids will receive additional funding.

“The meteorite explosion has raised the awareness of the [dangerousness] of the phenomena among the population and the politicians,” the ESA’s Bobrinsky said, noting that they would get a sense of any changes when European ministers meet next year to discuss the agency’s 2014 budget.

Ministers will also have to confront a number of other questions, including a legal framework for how and when objects like asteroids and meteorites are addressed, who would pay for the evacuation efforts if a faulty projection is made, what would happens if an impact occurs despite having its course changed, and if a NEO is headed for a particular country, should other countries participate in that mission.

Harris from the German Space Agency said “any awareness by the public will bring pressure on politicians.”

Comment: Don’t get us wrong, we are all for “raising the awareness of the [dangerousness] of the phenomena among the population and the politicians.” The danger is real, and what ever happened in Chelyabinsk was just a small reminder of what may yet transpire. But, there are several factors that have to be considered. Factors that make us highly suspicious of the UN’s and other politicians’ intentions regarding the threat from space. As George Orwell’s quote goes: “He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future.” And there is enough evidence to indicate, that for quite a while PTB’s agenda was to keep the reality of cosmic threat under a tight lid in order to maintain the illusion of control.

Consider the following information:

Military Hush-Up: Incoming Space Rocks Now Classified

Objects apparently pass us by all the time and we don’t notice them until they’re here:

Bus-sized asteroid shaves Earth with one day’s notice

Have you heard about Dark Comets? Imagine trying to track one of those!

We think what it comes down to is the fact there is no comprehensive, global, civilian Near Earth Object monitoring or tracking system. Lots of programs have been floated over the decades; some take off, but most flop, usually because of a lack of funding. The space threat just wasn’t taken seriously enough. The renowned astrophysicist Victor Clube and others tried to warn them but our Dear Leaders didn’t see any profit in it. Instead, the scientific funding, research and technology was all funneled into sustaining the Cold War, and when that ended, the War on Terror. Perhaps it will change, but we are not holding our breath.

Source: DW.de

Mozambique flooding displaces thousands

159981123

At least 36 people have been killed and about 70,000 displaced by flooding in Mozambique, according to figures released by the UN, as the African nation braces for renewed storms.

“A total of 26 persons have died in [the worst affected southern province of] Gaza alone, with the nationwide death toll at 36,” the UN in Mozambique said in a statement on Saturday.

The number of displaced people now stands at 67,995 while nearly 85,000 have been affected by the raging waters in recent days, the UN said.

The UN urged donors to urgently make more funds available “to help deal with this emergency” in the impoverished nation.

Mozambique+pxqqq
A reporter for the AFP news agency on the scene saw thousands of residents who had fled their homes stuck on road sides leading out of devastated towns, surviving on scarce aid and in some cases forced to eat grasshoppers.

In the tourist coastal city of Xai-Xai, spared until Friday, up to eight metres of water was expected to hit.

“The water is coming into the city. It is just starting. Some roads in the lower part of town are under water,” said Joao Carlos, government spokesperson.

Severe flooding in Xai-Xai would sever the main road connection between the north and south of the country.

“Private and commercial services have been evacuated from the lower parts of the city to higher areas,” said Sylvia Paolo, police spokeswoman.

Humanitarian assistance

Humanitarian workers are now racing to provide food and shelter before cholera, malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea grip those left homeless by the floods.

Agencies are also rushing to supply three mobile hospital tents, 15,000 mosquito nets and various other provisions.

According to the National Water Directorate, nine rivers in five basins were above alert levels, including the Zambezi and the Limpopo.

In the capital Maputo several bridges, roads and schools were seriously damaged.

Meanwhile, severe flooding continued to spread across the south of the country, with international agencies and neighbouring South Africa scrambling to ease the humanitarian disaster.

The floods are a result of week-long torrential rains in South Africa and Zimbabwe that swelled the Limpopo river forcing an orange alert on January 12, when the toll began.

But the full impact of the rains were only now being felt.

Initial evacuations of around 30,000 people in the southern region who did not hear or ignored flood warnings were under way.

South Africa, where the flood waters have killed at least 12 people in the past week, dispatched two military helicopters and divers on Friday to assist with the evacuations.

A South African Hercules C-130 military transport plane was also due to take off late on Friday with a contingent of doctors, nurses and social workers to attend to the flood victims.

Towns such as Chokwe in the province of Gaza were submerged, with thousands of homes destroyed and key services such as banks, shops, schools and hospitals affected.

The price tag from the flood devastation in the capital alone is expected to be around $30m, according to UN agencies.

The deluge also wreaked havoc in South Africa where some 15,000 crocodiles escaped after flood gates were opened at a breeding farm in the Limpopo area.

Source: Al Jazeera

Senator Cruz: “Obama High On Power, Drunk the Kool-Aid”

Obama_Beer1_-_Beer_ConspiracySenator Ted Cruz appeared on Laura Ingraham’s radio program this week and said that Obama is “high on his own power” and that “this is a president who has drunk the Kool-Aid.”

Cruz spoke concerning the executive orders signed by Obama regarding mandates for gun control in America. Cruz said: “He is feeling right now high on his own power, and he is pushing on every front, on guns. And I think it’s really sad to see the president of the United States exploiting the murder of children and using it to push his own extreme, anti-gun agenda. I think what the president is proposing and the gun control proposals that are coming from Democrats in the Senate are, number one, unconstitutional, and number two, they don’t work. They’re bad policy.”

Since Obama signed 23 executive orders altering the rights of registered gun owners across the US, new ideas on victimizing law-abiding gun owners have surfaced with Willie Cochran, a Chicago Alderman, requesting that his city council propose all guns be equipped with a GPS tracking device. Cochran said: “Just like if your car gets stolen, OnStar can tell you where your car is. If your gun gets stolen, and you report it, we should be able to find that gun.”

Guns

Stephanie Cutter, former deputy campaign manager for Obama For America, explained that Obama’s “network across this country, grassroots individuals, who organize, volunteered with their time to get the president reelected are much more powerful than the NRA lobby.”

Cutter stated vehemently that “[the] network [will be] activated, very soon. And for good reason. We need to pass commonsense legislation to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who shouldn’t be carrying guns. That’s the commonsense nature of this.”

Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, said in a recent statement that she is “proud to support” Obama’s gun grab.

Napolitano went on to say: “DHS together with the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the FBI have worked to identify measures that could be taken to reduce the risk of mass casualty shootings. In the coming days, DHS will expand and formalize coordination of ongoing efforts intended to prevent future mass casualty shootings, improve preparedness, and to strengthen security and resilience in schools and other potential targets. DHS will work with partners at all levels of government, to address five critical areas intended to reduce the risk of mass casualty shootings in the United States: Prevention, Protection, Response, Education, and Research/Evaluation. DHS will also work with law enforcement to refresh, expand and prioritize the implementation of nationwide public awareness efforts such as the ‘If You See Something, Say Something™’ campaign. This is a critical issue that requires immediate attention and I look forward to supporting the President and this Administration as we move ahead.”

In March, the UN will reconvene in New York to negotiate the finalization of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). Countries like Australia, Japan, and the UK have joined with other nations to draft “a strong, balanced and effective treaty, which would set the highest possible common global standards for the international transfer of conventional arms.”

The draft treaty under consideration would announced that the Obama administration is working with the United Nations (UN) to approve, through the US Congress; the ATT. Clinton affirmed that the US would facilitate talks with the UN at the last the Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, as long as it “operates under the rules of consensus decision-making. Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly.”

caminvan_s640x427

Obama is supporting the ATT and recognized “that disarmament, arms control and non-proliferation is essential”, meaning citizens could no longer own firearms if there were to be peace in the world.

However, the UN sees the armory of governments as an “effective national control”. To ensure the UN is able to take gun rights away from every citizen in ever country they have devised this treaty to influence “national legislation, regulations and procures on the transfer of arms, military equipment and dual-use goods and technology” for the maintenance of international peace and security.

In the end, the UN will govern the right of arms control, legal matters concerning arms control and the methods and means by which arms are allocated to individual nations.

Within the ATT, there is not one mention of the 2nd Amendment rights of Americans or even how the ATT may affect those rights. In fact, the provisions of the ATT are in contrary to existing laws and if signed, would simply supersede laws in existence to conform to the international mandates proposed in the ATT. The ultimate goal of disarming Americans in clearly noted in its silence and ambiguous tone toward the sovereignty of nations that allow by Constitutional right that their citizens bear protective arms.

In the report “Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds”, the necessity of “fusion” wherein the US and China meld into a collaborative global unity is viewed as the solution to the coming problems. Without this scenario, it is envisioned that “interstate conflict[s] increase” and “the US draws inward” which will halt all growth toward globalization.

Failing to fuse together will also result in a world where “inequalities explode as some countries become big winners and others fail. … Without completely disengaging, the US is no longer the ‘global policeman.’”

Source

EU countries urge Israel not to invade Gaza

BRUSSELS – Two leading EU countries have urged Israel not to launch ground operations in Gaza.

Speaking ahead of a foreign ministers’ meeting in Brussels on Monday (19 November), the UK’s Wiliam Hague told Sky news on Sunday that “a ground invasion of Gaza would lose Israel a lot of the international support and sympathy that they have in this situation.”

France’s Laurent Fabius while on a visit to Tel Aviv also on Sunday told press: “War is not an option. It’s never the solution.”

The EU in a joint statement last week blamed Hamas, the militant group which controls Gaza, for starting the fighting.

“The rocket attacks by Hamas and other factions in Gaza which began this current crisis are totally unacceptable,” its communique said.

But Hague and Fabius took different lines in their public remarks.

“It is Hamas that bears … the principle responsibility for starting all of this,” Hague said. “Responsibility is shared. There are rockets fired from Gaza and there are extremely deadly attacks against the people of Gaza,” Fabius noted.

For its part, the UN’s office in East Jerusalem says the escalation began when Israel assassinated a senior Hamas commander on 14 November.

The US-based NGO Human Rights Watch says it began when Israeli fire killed a 13-year-old Palestinian boy on 8 November.

With 95 Palestinian and three Israeli deaths so far, the crisis is to dominate the EU ministers’ talks, pushing other Middle East issues into the background.

Ministers had planned to discuss Palestine’s plan to call a UN vote on 29 November on upgrading its status to “observer state.”

But Hague said the UN bid is a bad idea in the current context. “I think it would be a mistake for the Palestinians to try at this moment … because it would be so divisive among all the people whose help they need to get the peace process going,” he told Sky.

Palestine’s draft UN resolution has some sympathy in Brussels, however.

One senior EU contact told EUobserver the text is “mild” because it does not call for countries which do not recognize Palestinian sovereignty to do so and does not call on Israel to take back the millions of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. At the same time, it gives a nod to UN resolution 181, which describes Israel as a “Jewish state.”

Ministers had also planned to take note of an EU report on Jewish settler violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.

Giving a broader context to the decades-old enmity between the two sides, the report says the Israeli army does little to protect Palestinian victims.

It urges individual EU countries to consider travel bans on settler extremists, an EU source noted.

Foreign ministers will also look at developments in Mali, Syria and Ukraine. But decisions on the three dossiers are to be left for later.

There is no EU consensus on recognizing the newly-formed National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces as the legitimate government of Syria despite the fact France took the step last week.

Detailed plans on how many troops and what kind of financial or intelligence support to give to Mali to reconquer its northern provinces from Toureg and Islamist warlords are due in December.

Ministers will also wait until next month to decide what to do with an EU-Ukraine political and trade agreement following flawed elections in the EU neighbor.

Source

A UN resolution approved over 60 years ago could have resolved the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but the Palestinians rejected it

In February of 1947, Great Britain, which had control of the area of the Middle East that includes modern day Jordan and Israel and the areas claimed today by the Palestinians, decided to turn the issue over to the UN which then decided to establish two states at that time, one for the Palestinians and one for the Jews.
The Palestinian rejection of the UN resolution was not only political, but they launched a large scale terrorist campaign against the Jewish people followed by an invasion of Israel by five Arab armies to destroy Israel when it declared its independence in May of 1948.
The rejection of a UN resolution to establish the states of Palestine and Israel in the Middle East in 1947 set the stage for the present day conflict as well as the end of times scenario for these two peoples that can be found in Bible prophecy.
The UN Resolution 181 passed on November 29, 1947 by a large majority of the member states of the General Assembly set in place the establishment of two new states in the Middle East, Israel and Palestine. By direct order of the Palestinian leaders, the elderly, women and children of the Palestinian people fled the area as the militant Palestinians moved to annihilate the Jews so there would be only one new state, Palestine.
This report of the beginnings of the present day Israeli-Palestinian conflict is also the evidence that Bible prophecy will be fulfilled. The descendants of Esau, the Palestinians of today, vowed that they would return and rebuild in what they claimed to be their land which is modern day Israel, Malachi 1:4. The ancient prophet Ezekiel wrote in Ezekiel 35 that these Palestinians would kill the Jews, verse 5, and take their land, verse 10. Obadiah, another Jewish prophet, reveals that the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will only come about when the Messiah, Jesus Christ, returns to earth, Obadiah 15-18.
Palestinian rejection of the UN partition plan did indeed set the stage for Bible prophecy to be fulfilled.